Friedrich Merz says Iran deserves being the target of war because it hasnt bent the knee to sanctions

Say what you will about Germany's current 'elites', but they are consistent: Once they don't give a damn about international law, elementary fairness, rudimentary human decency, and, last but not least, basic logic, they really won't quit before their country's reputation is ruined as it has not been since 1945. Hyperbole, you think? Can it really be that bad, you wonder?

Leave it to Chancellor Friedrich Merz and company to achieve what seems almost impossible. For almost two-and-a-half years, not one but two German governments have been, in effect, complicit in Israel'scontinuingGazagenocide. Under former Chancellor Olaf Scholz from the centrist Social-Democrats - otherwise remembered for gutless evasion when US ex-president Joe Biden announced, in essence, that he was going to blow up Nord Stream - as well as under the unusually dishonest Merz from the centrist Christian-Democrats, Berlin has supplied Israelwith arms(and probablymisled the International Court of Justiceabout it), diplomatic cover,legal support,media propaganda, and the oftenbrutal suppressionof protests against Israel's crimes.

Indeed, recently a UN special rapporteur has identified the "use of anti-terrorism laws to restrict advocacy for Palestinian rights" as "a primary concern"in a report warningthat the "space for freedom of expression is shrinking" in Germany.

Against this awful and shameful background, the fresh war of aggression launched by Israel and its American auxiliaries - that's the technically correct term for troops serving a foreign nation - could, conceivably, have been a very late wake-up call. Perhaps, an eternal optimist may have thought, the sheer brazenness of the attack will make even Berlin hesitate. Nope. Instead, Friedrich Merz and official Germany in general have radicalized their virtually nihilistic denial of law, ordinary ethics, and common sense.

One day after the beginning of the Israeli-American war of aggression, Merz took the lead and set the tone bygoing public with a perverse misreading of the situation. Starting by labeling the heinous assault - launched, according to US and Israeli custom, under the cover of ongoing negotiations - "massive military strikes," Merz acknowledged that they had killed members of the Iranian government (which he, of course, caricatured as a "Mullah" and "terror regime") including "the religious leader" Ayatollah Khamenei. If you expected the slightest sign of disapproval or even just discomfort at these cold-blooded murders of high government officials, you don't know Friedrich Merz yet.

Instead the German chancellor - or in his terms, perhaps, 'vassal regime' leader? - highlighted the need to help German tourists stranded in the warzone and to protect public order in Germany by preventing "antisemitic and anti-American attacks." Translation from Berlin officialese: by ramping up suppression of all and any criticism of Israel and America.

Then, after a catalogue of Israeli and American propaganda talking points against Iran - nuclear this, ballistic that... you know the drill - reproduced with the earnest assiduity of an eager pet pupil, Merz went on to assure "many Iranians"that his Berlin regime shared their relief at, in effect, being properly bombed, again.

In general, the chancellor's speech was a textbook example of perpetrator-victim inversion. Clearly approving of the Israeli-American assault, Merz had the chutzpah to sternly demand that Tehran must"at once" stop its "indiscriminate attacks."Those, of course, do not, actually, exist. Because Iran is acting in clear and obvious self-defense - the only legitimate reason, apart from a UN mandate, for resorting to military force - and, as before, its counter-strikes at those attacking it are still remarkably selective and restrained.

To be fair even to Merz, at least, he was a little less disingenuous than usual. He frankly, if in stilted language,admitted that he could not care less about international law. Friedrich, to be honest, we have always known that much about you - despite your hypocritical invocation of "rules" and "values" whenever you feel like going after Russia again - but it's nice you're coming out so openly now.

But Merz got back to his usual, absurdly devious self very quickly. Because, you see, it's Iran that is to blame when Friedrich Merz treats international law as utterly dispensable. At least according to Friedrich Merz, who explained that all those beautifully law-based measures taken regarding and, really, against Iran before this fresh war, did not work. Oh, Tehran, really how uncouth of you! Neither devastating sanctions, nor the US cancelling the JCPOA agreement, nor ongoing assassination and subversion campaigns waged by Israel and its friends, nor last year's '12-day' war of aggression made you submit.

For, clearly, according to Berlin logic, these must be those international-law based operations Merz was referring to. Make it make sense. Now, in his defense, for a man who sees no problem with his US and Polish 'allies' and Ukrainian dependents blowing up Germany's vital infrastructure, the Iranian insistence on not being bullied and defending national sovereignty must be truly incomprehensible. So maybe, Merz isn't really morally and legally perverse but just a tad out of his very shallow depth.

By the way, Merz's justifying a war of aggression by Iran not having bent the knee even after decades of "comprehensive sanctions packages" is likely to be noted with great interest in Moscow: If that's how German elites see the world now - first we sanction you and then, if you still don't knuckle under, we have a de facto right to attack you - the Russian leadership is certain to draw the obvious conclusions. Again, Merz probably didn't even understand the insanely destabilizing implications of what he was saying. But they are there, nonetheless.

In short, Merz's address was stunningly absurd and a horrific moral and intellectual failure, a disgrace for his country. It should be noted, however, that polls show that this atrocious line of unconditional compliance with both Benjamin Netanyahu's genocidal apartheid Israel and Donald Trump's Make-Israel-Greater US is not shared by all Germans. On the contrary,57% of respondents of a poll are against the attack. Less than a third - 29% - approve of it. Likewise, even in Germany, a preponderant majority - 83% - has finally learned to consider Israel's actions in Gaza unjustified: In the fall of 2023, when Israel started its genocide, 50% of respondents thought they were justified.

Such polls are nothing to be proud of: German society as a whole is still far too wrongheaded and submissive, when it comes to Israel's crimes and those of the US, too. But if you know the level of crude media propaganda and relentlessly one-sided indoctrination that Germans are subject to, these numbers still shows that for the nation - unlike for its "Atlanticist" elites - there may be some hope.

For now, however, the failure that Merz represents is still in control. He himselfhas gone to Washingtonto flatter Donald Trump by praising his latest crime to his face. Netanyahu, meanwhile,may well be in Berlin, in which case German politicians, judges, prosecutors, and police are criminally liable for failing to arrest the war criminal, as the warrant of the International Criminal Court unambiguously requires. Even if his plane parked in Germany is only part of a deception operation, Berlin's taking part in such a ruse is also morally repulsive and possibly criminal, too.

Germany as a whole has failed the tests of both the Gaza genocide and the wars of aggression against Iran. Its "elites" are a disgrace represented all too well by its chancellor. That is a sad thing to have to state. Yet there is no chance of political and moral renewal without facing this fact. We are back to an old question: What would it take for Berlin to grow a conscience?

(RT.com)